Features of Risk

Reputation risk features typically include economic harm from angry, disappointed stakeholders that is often exacerbated by media amplification. Steel City Re helps executives, companies, and sovereign entities identify and defend against these risks.

Reputation risk is a threat to reputation value—a behavioral economic construct.

Customers’ decision to purchase, employees’ desires to be employed by a particular firm, the rating of bonds by credit analysts, the recommendations for equities by buy-side analysts, and the decision to prosecute by regulators are all social processes. All are influenced by stories. When those stories speak to quality products, superior employment experiences, authentic systems for risk management, quality governance and compliance in terms that create expectations; they produce corporate (and personal) value.

Stories that create value promote emotional investments—such as trust—in quality, ethics, safety, security, sustainability, and innovation.

Media stories are merely one of many influencers of expectations. Other influences include:

  • Corporate culture evidenced in governance decisions
  • Financial and extra-financial information
  • Associations and affiliations
  • Stakeholders’ own experiences

Reputation risk, the economic threat to enterprise value, lurks in the gap between stakeholder expectations and operational reality. When reality falls short, media plays a role in amplifying and exacerbating stakeholder disappointment and anger.

“Brexiteers promised the advantages of EU membership with none of the disadvantages …disillusionment was inevitable.”

Bagehot, The Economist

When stakeholders hold a company, its executives or its board culpable for their disappointment, the anger creates go-forward reputational value losses, which are “costs of disappointment.”

Disappointed stakeholders destroy value by becoming disloyal customers, disengaged employees, distracted suppliers, distrustful creditors, dismissive investors, and determined litigators & regulators.

Reputation risk features include the potential to blossom into full blown reputational crises with the speed and intensity of a tornado. That is why reputation risk management—a battle for the mind of stakeholders—must begin preemptively. Insurances can be a key part of this effort.

Authentic stories prepositioned and widely shared are reputation tornado shelters—protection against climate change of the cultural kind. The stories must be simple, convincing and completely credible. They must illustrate corporate reputation risk management systems, policies and procedures, backed by demonstrable evidence such as third party insurances, so that stakeholders can appreciate and value corporate intent and direct anger away from company, its executives or its board.

Redirected anger underpins reputation resilience.

Relevant Articles

Dwindling Reputation for Brand Safety at Elon Musk’s X. About one-quarter of advertisers plan to cut spending on social media site X, according to according to a new survey of marketers by Kantar.
Dwindling Reputation for Brand Safety at Elon Musk’s X. About one-quarter of advertisers plan to…
Read More
32.9% of companies, including American Airlines and US Bancorp, have compensation clawback policies for reputation harm.
32.9% of companies, including American Airlines and US Bancorp, have compensation clawback policies for reputation…
Read More
Profitable financial loss absorption, differently, with advances in metrology—e.g., synthetic indices for reputation—and parametric technology. A spin on the whitepaper from The Geneva Association.
Profitable financial loss absorption, differently, with advances in metrology—e.g., synthetic indices for reputation—and parametric…
Read More
Investors are not good at predicting the net impact of reputation risk. They tend to over or underestimate the net impact on future cash flows on the basis of sentiment and noise rather than on indicators of stakeholder disaffection and behavioral change such as those integral to Steel City Re's premier reputation risk prediction tool, its Resilience Monitor.
Investors are not good at predicting the net impact of reputation risk. They tend to…
Read More
Quantas ex-CEO Forfeits Bonus for Reputation Damage
Qantas Airways Ltd. docked A$9.3 million ($6.1 million) from former Chief Executive Officer Alan Joyce’s…
Read More
Board members and those in C-suite executive positions view the reputational risks posed by litigation as the most significant risks facing their businesses. This suggests that litigation risk counts as one of the principal, strategic considerations of large companies, rather than being a purely operational or legal concern.
FTI Consulting’s research found that Board members and those in C-suite executive positions view the…
Read More